And so now I'll give in and go ahead and buy an Adobe product for around $100. But looking at all the recent coverage of the new IPod with photos, - its not looking to me like Apple will be releasing IPhoto for Windows like they did for ITunes anytime soon. I like the look & interface, - and was hoping to have something similar to use with my photos. I'm sure you can tell I'm no fancy hard-core programmer - or whatever. I've been waiting for a few months to buy a photo program for use on my Windows machine.
#Apple iphoto download for windows Pc#
I hate the PC interface, and so make it "more mac". Personally, I run OS X on my mac, nut I have to use a PC in work (antiquated network running IPX)
In fact, it could be argued that more people are more likely to buy Macs having experienced something like the interface they run. Once you accept that PC users are not going to change platform, your argument falls over. Gonna shut them down because PC users like that Mac interface? Provides a Finder-like interface that can mimic OS 8/9/X Server/X. NextStep/AfterStep/LiteStep are ALL capable of looking and behaving like OS X or OS 9 for that matter.
This seems to be the basis for objections to Aqua-Apps.
#Apple iphoto download for windows code#
However, when it comes to all the other Aqua apps for windows, I really don't see what the problem is.Ī: There is going to be NO code theft by the developers.ī: It's free, so the developers aren't even making money on it.Ĭ: It runs on a totally different platform.Īpple aren't going to be losing money by downloading windows apps, especailly when you consider that most PCs users are not about to start using Macs "because they look nice"! OK, I'll admit that Apple may have a case against the developers of "iPhoto for Windows". This legal argument really is quite tenuous.
0 kommentar(er)
